Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Martinez, Sr. et al v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2023cv11350
Plaintiff:
Luis Antonio Martinez, Sr., Ana Martinez DeJesus, Yaritza Martinez DeJesus and others
Defendant:
County of Wayne, Dr. Carl Schmidt, Dr. Leigh Hlavaty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph OdishIn re: Joseph Odish
as 20-1869
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General, PETER A. CAPLAN and others
Petitioner:
In re: JOSEPH ODISH
Caplan v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01374
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Yoav Caplan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mahamed v. BAC Home Loans Serv LP et al
as 3:2011cv00619
Plaintiff:
Flarrie Kimberley Mahamed
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Serv LP , Bank of America, N.A. , Rubin Lublin Suarez Serrano, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roeglin v. Genesco Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01183
Plaintiff:
Rick Roeglin, Rick Roeglin, Rick Roeglin and others
Defendant:
Genesco Inc., Hal N. Pennington, Robert J. Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Almon v. Caplan et al
as 2:2007cv10219
Plaintiff:
Jerome Almon
Defendant:
Elinor Caplan, Alan Nymark, Dennis Coderre and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Lorillard Tobacco Company v. Chester, Willcox & Saxbe, LLP
as 2:2004cv00715
Plaintiff:
Lorillard Tobacco Company , Philip Morris USA Inc. and RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company
Defendant:
Chester, Willcox & Saxbe, LLP , Brown, Terrell, Hogan, Ellis, McClamma & Yegelwel, PA , Barrett Law Offices and others
Counter_claimant:
Lewis and Lewis , Frederick B Clark, Esq. , McTeer & Associates and others
Counter_defendant:
Lorillard Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA Inc. and RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company
Movant:
BTHEMY (FL) FUNDING II LLC , FH (FL) FUNDING II LLC , GP (FL) FUNDING II LLC and others
Respondent:
Gentry and Phillips, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
