Cases 41 - 50 of 119
ONYIAH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv01556
Plaintiff:
OBINA ONYIAH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, FORMER COMMISSIONER CHARLES RAMSEY, POLICE CAPT./LT. JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SAVAGE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv00960
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SAVAGE
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, LT. BRIAN HILTNER, CO KUBLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
SCOTT v. THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00658
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, BARRY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MELENDEZ v. STEBERGER et al
as 5:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
WILBERTO MELENDEZ
Defendant:
WARDEN CHERYL STEBERGER, CAPTAIN JENKINS, MAJOR CHIRCHELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Enforcement of Judgment
OLIVER v. ARAMARK FOOD INC. et al
as 5:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
BRIAN C. OLIVER
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD INC., ARAMARK SUPERVISOR TASSONE, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBICHAW v. MCGEE et al
as 2:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
RENALDO M. ROBICHAW
Defendant:
SEAN P. MCGEE, MARK S. MURRAY, GARY CHESNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWLAND v. PISTRO et al
as 2:2021cv04466
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR ROWLAND
Defendant:
KEVIN D. PISTRO, CAPTAIN ROOT, LT. SHANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
