Cases 11 - 20 of 33
NORMAN et al v. MADDOX et al
as 4:2020cv00437
Defendant:
DAVID MADDOX, TIMOTHY JETTON, DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN L NORMAN and KEONA S BERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERVIL v. GRAVES et al
as 1:2020cv00174
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, ROBERT GIBSON, LIFESTREAMS BEHAVIORAL CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
VENEL JASON PIERVIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARKOS v. FLOAT MY BOAT RENTALS LLC et al
as 3:2020cv02692
Defendant:
Captain Clever Marketing, LLC, Float My Boat Rentals LLC and CAPTAIN CLEVER MARKETING LLC
Plaintiff:
Steven LaMont Markos
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
FLEMING v. JOHNSON et al
as 5:2020cv00072
Defendant:
MARK INCH, MAJOR, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
TYRECE FLEMING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEKONING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv10411
Plaintiff:
CAPTAIN DEKONING
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. CITY TRANSIT TRANSPORATION et al
as 4:2019cv00372
Defendant:
CAPTAIN D'S WEST and CITY TRANSIT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HELP FOR DISABILITY PERSON OF NEED AND EMERGENCY PRESECTOR OF LAW
Plaintiff:
JOE WADE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHILLER v. COLLINS et al
as 4:2019cv00195
Defendant:
MARSHAL, COLLINS and CAPTAIN HENDERSON
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L SCHILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUFF v. JONES et al
as 3:2019cv00473
Defendant:
WARDEN, JULIE L JONES, CAPTAIN and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN HUFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRIDDLE v. USP COLEMAN et al
as 1:2019cv00031
Respondent:
ADMINISTRATIONAL PERSONNEL, USP COLEMAN, WARDEN and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER CRIDDLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MOORE v. CAPTAIN et al
as 3:2019cv00039
Defendant:
SERGEANT, ULT, COI IBANEZ and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE MOORE, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
