Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Triplett v. Sheldon et al
as 3:2014cv00819
Plaintiff:
Timothy Triplett
Defendant:
Edward Sheldon, Jodi Factor, G. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Beightler et al
as 3:2013cv02609
Plaintiff:
Herbert Anderson
Defendant:
M. Beightler, McKee, Ms. Master and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Scarsborough et al
as 4:2013cv00170
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Drew Scarsborough, Frank DeClair, Doug LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. United States F.B.O.P., et al
as 4:2012cv02802
Defendant:
United States F.B.O.P., N.E.O.C.C., Officer Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ajian v. Richland County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2012cv02798
Plaintiff:
Justin T. Ajian
Defendant:
Richland County Sheriffs Office, Captain Masi and Sgt. Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Toledo Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2012cv01926
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ray Ross
Defendant:
Toledo Correctional Institution, ODRC, Officer Burtwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Imburgia v. Cruz et al
as 1:2011cv02823
Plaintiff:
Charles Imburgia
Defendant:
Arturo Cruz, Lt. Burgos, Captain Brlas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Embassy Realty Investments, Inc. et al v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2011cv01545
Plaintiff:
Embassy Realty Investments, Inc. , John Barnes Jr. and Captain Buffalo Foods, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, Edward Rybka, Ronald O'Leary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Brooklyn et al
as 1:2011cv00384
Petitioner:
Kyle James Harris
Respondent:
Mdc Brooklyn, Duke Terrell, Captain Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bloodworth v. Konteh et al
as 3:2010cv01617
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bloodworth
Defendant:
Khelleh Konteh, Don A. Coble, Bill Bartleson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
