Cases 1 - 10 of 23
OLIVER v. WHITTINGTON et al
as 5:2021cv00183
Defendant:
WARDEN WHITTINGTON, OFFICER TURNER, OFFICER DEESE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searight v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00429
Defendant:
Captain Lawson, Alabama Department of Corrections, John Crow and others
Plaintiff:
John Searight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Crow et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00348
Defendant:
John Pryor, John Crow, Mrs Truss and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel MacArthur Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Myers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00238
Defendant:
Warden Myers, Lt. Jones, Officer Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Prince Sayon Lenard Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Myers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv01089
Defendant:
Captain Dansby, Officer Lampkin, Warden Lighten and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Joseph Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Bradford et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv01091
Defendant:
Officer Lampkin, Captain Dansby, Warden Lighten and others
Plaintiff:
LaShaun Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Myers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00355
Defendant:
Sgt. Borders, Lt. Jones, C.O. Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Fitzgerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shamburger v. Myers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00739
Defendant:
Sgt. Edwards, Sgt. Juton, Walter Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Shamburger, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarrell v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00602
Plaintiff:
Marquise Jarrell
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Easterling Correctional Facility, Walter Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Towles v. Myers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Rolland Sean Towles
Defendant:
Walter Myers, Jefferson Dunn and Captain Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
