Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Crisologo v. Nordstrom Card Services Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Daniel Galvin Crisologo
Defendant:
Nordstrom Card Services Inc and Michael Bengs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Card v. Tacoma Municipal Court et al
as 3:2024cv05007
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
Tacoma Municipal Court, All City Bail Bonds, Jonathan Lack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Card v. Christel et al
as 3:2024cv05005
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
David W Christel, Tiffany M Cartwright and Grady J Leupold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Card v. Leupold
as 3:2023cv06152
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
Grady J Leupold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Recinos v. Chase Bank et al
as 3:2023cv06133
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Recinos
Defendant:
Chase Bank, Chase Freedom Card, Chase Amazon Card and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Recinos v. Chase Bank et al
as 3:2023cv06123
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Recinos
Defendant:
Chase Bank, Chase Freedom Card, Chase Amazon Card and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting
Card v. King County Superior Court et al
as 2:2023cv01343
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
King County Superior Court, Jonathan Lack, Aimee Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Card v. Tacoma Municipal Court et al
as 3:2023cv05781
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
Tacoma Municipal Court, Randall Hanson, Steve Krupa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cann v. Nordstrom Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
D'voreaux Cann
Defendant:
Nordstrom Inc, TD Bank USA NA and Nordstrom Card Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
