Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Marquess v. Cardflex, Inc.
as 22-1822
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gregory Marquess, DBA Skinitems.com and Skintrigue, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Cardflex, Inc., DBA Cliq, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., John Does 1-10 Inclusive and others
Marquess et al v. Cardflex, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04790
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marquess d/b/a Skinitems.com, Skintrigue, Inc., Gregory Marquess and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 Inclusive, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Cardflex, Inc. d/b/a Cliq and others
Interested Party:
Jonathan R Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Pivotal Payments, Inc. v. Phillips et al
as 2:2016mc50492
Plaintiff:
Pivotal Payments, Inc.
Defendant:
Andrew Phillips, CardFlex, Inc. and U.S. Alliance Group, Inc.
Cardflex, Inc. v. Garvis et al
as 1:2016cv01404
Plaintiff:
Cardflex, Inc.
Defendant:
Etail Medical, LLC and Greg Garvis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pivotal Payments, Inc. v. Phillips, et al
as 2:2014cv04910
Defendant:
CardFlex, Inc., Andrew Phillips and U.S. Alliance Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pivotal Payments, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Federal Trade Commission v. CardFlex, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00397
Defendant:
John S Blaugrund, Blaze Processing, LLC, CardFlex, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Cardflex, INC v. Protection Judgment, LLC et al
as 3:2011mc09183
Plaintiff:
Cardflex, INC
Defendant:
Protection Judgment, LLC and Hamilton Edward Spear
CardFlex Inc v. Protection Junction LLC et al
as 8:2010cv01556
Defendant:
Hamilton Edward Spear, Protection Junction LLC, Daniel Edward Powell and others
Not Classified By Court:
Collect Co and Silverado IP, Inc.
Plaintiff:
CardFlex Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
