Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Romrell et al v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Company et al
as 2:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Progressive Northwestern Insurance Company and John Does 1-5
Plaintiff:
Michael Romrell and Cari Romrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Romrell et al v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Company et al
as 6:2020cv00089
Defendant:
Progressive Northwestern Insurance Company and John Does 1-5
Plaintiff:
Michael Romrell and Cari Romrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Biederman v. Ms. Powell et al
as 4:2018cv00016
Plaintiff:
Donald Dean Biederman
Defendant:
Ms. Powell, Cary Kenyon, Peter Molnar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradbury et al v. Three Forks, City of et al
as 2:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
Cary Bradbury and Katherine Main
Defendant:
Three Forks, City of , City of Three Forks Police Department and Troy Burdick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West Venture Properties, LLC et al v. Continental Casualty Company
as 9:2010cv00119
Plaintiff:
West Venture Properties, LLC , Cary Jo Hofstad and Hilary Anderson
Defendant:
Continental Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Assurance Company of America v. McDonald et al
as 9:2007cv00059
Plaintiff:
Assurance Company of America
Defendant:
Ranald McDonald, Derek Alt, Adrianne Arredondo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Van Alstine v. Budd et al
as 2:2007cv00017
Plaintiff:
Larry Van Alstine
Defendant:
G. Budd, Cathy Reaf, Ross Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Alstine v. Budd et al
as 6:2007cv00016
Plaintiff:
Larry Van Alstine
Defendant:
G. Budd, Cathy Reaf, Ross Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
