Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25598
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CARL BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv04005
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CARL BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BATES et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03217
Plaintiff:
CARL BOURGEOIS, MAURICE BOVEAR, KENNETH BOROM and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bates et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02180
Plaintiff:
Carl Bourgeois, Maurice Bovear, Kenneth Borom and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, Aearo Holdings, LLC, 3M Company and others
Hatterman v. Bell et al
as 4:2017cv00149
Plaintiff:
David Hatterman
Defendant:
Heather Bell, Jim Michaels, Joe Swain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Daviess- Dekalb Regional Jail District et al
as 5:2014cv06054
Plaintiff:
Steven Turner
Defendant:
Daviess- Dekalb Regional Jail District , Bob Gray , Carl Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Easements and Rights-of-Way Over a Total of 0.484 Acre of Land, More or Less in Hickman County, Tennessee
as 1:2013cv00098
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Easements and Rights-of-Way Over a Total of 0.484 Acre of Land, More or Less in Hickman County, Tennessee, Carl Brooks Gardner and Gilene C. Gardner
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
Lay et al v. Burley Stabilization Corporation
as 3:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Larry C. Lay , Roger Dale Philpott , Campbell P. Ridley, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Burley Stabilization Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brooks v. Gena
as 1:2011cv01591
Plaintiff:
Dennis Carl Brooks
Defendant:
Investigator Gena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
