Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Michael Moore v. Little, et al
as 16-60383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BANARD MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
NURSE UNKNOWN LITTLE, DAFFNEY DEVON SMITH, DOCTOR CARL FAULKS and others
Jeffrey Jackson v. Rice, et al
as 15-60630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY JERMAINE JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN RICE, FEDERICO OZALLE, Deputy Warden and DOCTOR CARL FAULKS
Alstyne v. St. Lawerence et al
as 4:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jerome Van Alstyne
Defendant:
Al St. Lawerence, Virginia Oneil, Megan Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Moore v. Little, et al
as 15-60196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BANARD MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
NURSE UNKNOWN LITTLE, DOCTOR CARL FAULKS, WARDEN RAY RICE and others
Timmy Thomas v. Dr. Carl Faulks, et al
as 15-60057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMMY THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR CARL FAULKS, East Mississippi Correctional Facility Director, Officially and Personally, DOCTOR MICHAEL REDDIX, Officially and Personally, CARL REDDIX, Officially and Personally and others
Smith v. Management and Training Corp. et al
as 3:2014cv00936
Plaintiff:
Tommy Smith
Defendant:
Management and Training Corp., Miss. Dept. of Corrections, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Use', Sr. v. Reddix et al
as 3:2014cv00228
Plaintiff:
Calvin Phillip Use', Sr.
Defendant:
Carl Reddix, Health Assurance, LLC, Carl Faulks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Little et al
as 3:2013cv00801
Plaintiff:
Michael Banard Moore
Defendant:
Unknown Little, Unknown Smith, Carl Faulks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Rice et al
as 3:2013cv01067
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Jermaine Jackson
Defendant:
Warden Rice , Federico Ozalle and Carl Faulks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Rice et al
as 4:2013cv00198
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Jermaine Jackson
Defendant:
Warden Rice, Deputy Warden, Carl Faulks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
