Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kailey v. Ritter et al
as 1:2011cv00144
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Bill (I) Ritter, Jr, Bill Ritter, Jr., Bill (I) Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kailey v. Ritter et al
as 1:2011cv00145
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Bill (I) Ritter, Jr, Bill Ritter, Jr., Bill (I) Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kailey v. Ritter et al
as 1:2010cv02171
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Bill (I) Ritter, Jr, Bill Ritter, Jr., Bill (I) Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Zenon, et al
as 1:2004cv01072
Petitioner:
John E. Lopez
Respondent:
Carl Zenon and Ken Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Zenon, et al
as 10-1032
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN E. LOPEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
CARL ZENON and JOHN W. SUTHERS, the Attorney General of the State of Colorado
West v. Ortiz, et al
as 08-1055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST WEST
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE ORTIZ, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, CARL ZENON, Four Mile Correctional Center - Warden, RON LEYBA, Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility - Warden and others
Nelson v. Colorado et al
as 1:2007cv01276
Plaintiff:
Travis Star Nelson
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Colorado Department of Corrections, Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos v. Owens et al
as 1:2007cv01073
Plaintiff:
Fidel G. Ramos
Defendant:
Bill Owens, Joseph Ortiz, Barry Pardus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keck v. Zenon et al
as 1:2007cv00987
Plaintiff:
Michael Keck
Defendant:
Carl (I) Zenon, Carl Zenon, Steven (I) Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Owens et al
as 1:2007cv00115
Plaintiff:
Fidel G. Ramos
Defendant:
Bill Owens, Joseph Ortiz, Barry Pardus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
