Cases 1 - 10 of 20
NARANJO v. COULEHAN et al
as 2:2023cv01983
Plaintiff:
ISAAC NARANJO
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER COULEHAN, HURD, WITTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv01780
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JONES and SHAMEL JONES
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, GEORGE LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BYRD v. HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv01726
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. BYRD and Al-Tariq Sharif Ali Byrd
Defendant:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, CHIEF DEPUTY LAURA K. WILLIAMS, DEPUTY DAVID ZETWO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROTEN v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
ISIAH ANDREW ROTEN
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, TABB BICKELL, MICHAEL ZAKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BONNER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv02137
Defendant:
DR. GOLSORK MUHAMMAD, MS. VOLTZ, MR. JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
EUGENE THYE BONNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNIDER v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00735
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, PUSHKALAI PILLAI, NEDRA GREGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv01556
Defendant:
SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ORLANDO HARPER, MICHAEL ISTICK and others
Plaintiff:
JULES MARQUIS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
FAHEY v. SWARTZ
as 1:2017cv00218
Plaintiff:
WARREN FAHEY
Defendant:
CARLA SWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPRUELL v. SHAWLEY et al
as 2:2017cv00809
Plaintiff:
LASHAWN SPRUELL
Defendant:
TRACY SHAWLEY, MICHAEL ZAKEN, ROBERT GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEARIN v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2014cv01717
Plaintiff:
THURMAN MEARIN
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, CARLA SWARTZ, ROBERT DIETZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
