Cases 1 - 10 of 13
BP Pipelines (North America) Inc. et al v. Carlisle & Bray Enterprises, LLC. et al
as 2:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Carlisle & Bray Enterprises, LLC., Carlisle & Bray Marine Equipment, LLC., Carlisle & Bray Marine, LLC. and others
Plaintiff:
BP Pipelines (North America) Inc. and BP Central Pipelines LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
BorgWarner Thermal Systems Inc. v. Carlisle Brake & Friction Inc.
as 2:2018cv12738
Plaintiff:
BorgWarner Thermal Systems Inc.
Defendant:
Carlisle Brake & Friction Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Burrell v. Carlisle et al
as 2:2017cv02290
Plaintiff:
Thomas Burrell
Defendant:
Wayne Carlisle , Carlisle Farms , Bill Mayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
China Export & Credit Corporation v. Carlisle Transportation Products, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00846
Defendant:
Carlisle Transportation Products, Inc. , Carlisle Companies, Inc. , Carlisle Fluid Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlisle et al v. Carlisle
as 2:2014cv11768
Plaintiff:
Sharon Carlisle , David Carlisle , Paul Carlisle and others
Defendant:
Michele Carlisle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlisle v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00209
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dawanell Carlisle
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Carlisle v. Andrews
as 1:2013cv00161
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dawanell Carlisle
Defendant:
Emma Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Carlisle v. Winona Health Services
as 2:2011cv00179
Plaintiff:
Saune-Elisabet C Carlisle
Defendant:
Winona Health Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Crosset Company, LLC v. Carlisle Supermarket, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
Crosset Company, LLC
Defendant:
Carlisle Supermarket, Inc., Edward Hinkle and SuperValu, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
