Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Carlisle v. USA
as 1:2011cv00110
Petitioner: Marcus Carlisle
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carlisle v. USA
as 1:2011cv00106
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Marcus Carlisle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carlisle v. Wright et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv01148
Plaintiff: William J Carlisle
Defendant: NFN Wright and J.S. Extraditioners Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00063
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carlisle v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv02567
Plaintiff: James Carlisle
Defendant: Stryker Corporation, Stryker Corporation, I-Flow Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
TEKsystems, Inc. v. Miller et al
as 3:2008cv01129
Plaintiff: TEKsystems, Inc. and TEKsystems, Inc.
Defendant: Jennifer Miller and Carlisle & Gallagher Consulting Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company v. Cheatham County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2008cv00674
Plaintiff: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company
Defendant: Cheatham County, Tennessee, Jane Dancey Trabue Sanders, Nelson T. Trabue, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Real Property None
Morrison v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv01144
Movant: Carlisle Morrison
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Carlisle v. USA
as 1:2008cv00055
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Marcus Carlisle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00336
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?