Cases 31 - 40 of 44
V-Tech Patents L.L.C. v. Carlisle Syntec, Inc.
as 4:2011cv00310
Plaintiff:
V-Tech Patents L.L.C.
Defendant:
Carlisle Syntec, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
v. NYLIFE Securities, LLC et al
as 4:2011mc00003
Respondent:
NYLIFE Securities, LLC
Claimant:
Jeff Badders, Clifton Boulware, Melinda Boulware and others
Receiver:
Kelly M. Crawford
Carlisle v. Walker et al
as 7:2010cv00174
Plaintiff:
William Carlisle
Defendant:
Mark Walker, David Stout, James Ellsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlisle v. Wright et al
as 7:2010cv00167
Plaintiff:
William J Carlisle
Defendant:
NFN Wright and J.S. Extraditioners Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlisle v. City of Flower Mound Texas The
as 4:2010cv00017
Plaintiff:
Paula Carlisle
Defendant:
City of Flower Mound Texas The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Carlisle Syntec Incorporated v. Dunn Southeast, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00344
Plaintiff:
Carlisle Syntec Incorporated
Defendant:
Dunn Southeast, Inc. and Factory Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Nissan North America Inc v. Carlisle Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv01623
Plaintiff:
Nissan North America Inc and Nissan North America Inc
Defendant:
Carlisle Corporation, Carlisle Corporation, Carlisle Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Armas v. Carlisle et al
as 7:2008cv00114
Petitioner:
John Armas
Respondent:
Vince Carlisle and Advandge Equment
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carlisle v. Vititow et al
as 6:2008cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jerry O Carlisle
Defendant:
Robert Vititow, Robert Vititow, Ralph Eddie Northcutt and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
