Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Erwin v. Teton County et al
as 2:2026cv00132
Defendant:
Teton County Human Resources Director, Teton County Chief Deputy Attorney, Teton County Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Erwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomson v. Hutchings et al
as 3:2025cv00452
Plaintiff:
David Robert Thomson
Defendant:
William Hutchings, James Scally, Aguilar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Espinoza et al
as 3:2023cv00639
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Leilanny Espinoza, Karissa Currier, Gabriela Najera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Nejara et al
as 3:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Garbriela Nejara, Karissa Currier, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Espinoza et al
as 2:2023cv00607
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Leilanny Espinoza, Karissa Currier, Gabriela Najera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Houston v. Jerry Howell, et al
as 23-15059
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW HOUSTON and MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Respondent / Appellee:
JERRY HOWELL, Warden, LT. CARLMAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Hendrix v. Davis et al
as 2:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Autum Davis, Justan Reyes, Frank Dreesen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Howell et al
as 2:2019cv01740
Respondent:
Jerry Howell, Carlman and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Matthew Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Toliver v. Carlman, et al
as 2:2017cv00679
Defendant:
Timothy Carlman and Ramos
Plaintiff:
George A Toliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlos Ruiz v. Brian Williams, et al
as 17-15253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS RUIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, TIMOTHY CARLMAN and STEPHEN TORSKY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
