Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Garcia-Pagan v. Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
as 3:2024cv01082
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garcia and Carlos R. Garcia-Pagan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Garcia v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv02102
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(SS) Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00018
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv05239
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
(SS) Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00924
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garica and Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2018cv00504
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Garcia v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv00796
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Garcia v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv02192
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Garcia v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv20823
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
