Cases 31 - 40 of 55
John Kelso v. Carlos Luna, et al
as 09-55034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DONALD KELSO
Defendant - Appellee:
CARLOS LUNA, Director, MURPHY, Dr., MALANCHARUVIL, Dr. and others
John Kelso v. Carlos Luna, et al
as 08-57018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DONALD KELSO
Defendant:
CARLOS LUNA, Director, Patton State Hospital, MAKAN CHARNVIL, Dr, Patton State Hospital, RUTH DOE, Unit Supervisor and others
Kelso v. Luna et al
as 5:2008cv01831
Plaintiff:
John Donald Kelso
Defendant:
Carlos Luna and Ruth Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Timphony L. Walker et al v. California Department of Mental Health et al
as 5:2008cv01801
Plaintiff:
Timphony L Walker, Elizabeth L Kottwitz and David Babin
Defendant:
California Department of Mental Health, Octavio Carlos Luna, Patton State Hospital Community Forensic Liaison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
John Donald Kelso v. Carlos Luna et al
as 5:2008cv01296
Defendant:
Makan Charnvil, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
John Donald Kelso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Donald Kelso v. Carlos Luna et al
as 5:2008cv01546
Plaintiff:
John Donald Kelso
Defendant:
Carlos Luna, Murphy, Malancharuvil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
John Donald Kelso v. Carlos Luna
as 5:2008cv01547
Plaintiff:
John Donald Kelso
Defendant:
Carlos Luna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Kelso v. Luna, et al
as 08-6224
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN D. KELSO
Respondent - Appellee:
CARLOS LUNA, EDMUND A. BROWN and JERRY BROWN
Kelso v. Luna
as 4:2008cv00506
Petitioner:
John Donald Kelso
Respondent:
Carlos Luna
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kelso v. Luna et al
as 4:2008cv00634
Plaintiff:
John Donald Kelso
Defendant:
Carlos Luna, Makan Charnvil, Ruth Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
