Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Carlos Mata PA v. Prichard
as 2:2022cv00505
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mata PA
Defendant:
Pablo O Prichard
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
USA v. Turhan Armstrong
as 20-50192
Defendant / Appellant:
TURHAN LEMONT ARMSTRONG, AKA Jameel Jamal, AKA Bob Jimenez, AKA Hassan Karakra, AKA Emmett Louis, AKA Frank Masari, AKA Carlos Mata, AKA Carlos Rivera, AKA Emilio Sanchez, AKA Jose Soto, AKA T, AKA Terrence, AKA Turhan Lemont Walker, AKA Kent Warden
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MATA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv43232
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS MATA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Juan Carlos Mata v. Veros Auto Credit, Inc.
as 8:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Mata
Defendant:
Veros Auto Credit, Inc.
Arturo Cervantes-Valencia v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-70747
Petitioner:
ARTURO CERVANTES-VALENCIA, AKA Carlos Mata
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Arturo Cervantes-Valencia v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73201
Petitioner:
ARTURO CERVANTES-VALENCIA, AKA Carlos Mata, AKA Arturo Valencia Cervantes
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Mata v. Levick et al
as 5:2010cv00419
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mata
Defendant:
Roger Levick, Machelle Dickerson, Stacey Randolph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mata et al v. Sanders Electric, LLC et al
as 5:2008cv00292
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mata, Juan Bautista and Jose Felix Soledad
Defendant:
Sanders Electric, LLC and Mark Sanders
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mata v. Nichols et al
as 6:2007cv00374
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mata
Defendant:
T. Nichols, G. L. Stephenson and Kelli Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:1992cv02388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garnishee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
