Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Juan Carlos Suarez v. Protein Essentials, LLC
as 2:2020cv00914
Defendant:
Protein Essentials, LLC
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Suarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carlos Suarez v. BMW of North America, LLC
as 5:2019cv00102
Plaintiff:
Carlos Suarez
Defendant:
BMW of North America, LLC and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Juan Carlos Suarez v. Stu Sherman
as 2:2018cv06605
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Suarez
Respondent:
Stu Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Juan Carlos Suarez v. Stu Sherman
as 2:2017cv07934
Defendant:
Stu Sherman
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Suarez
Juan Carlos Suarez v. Spearman et al
as 2:2015cv04918
Respondent:
Spearman and The Attorney General of the State of California
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Suarez
Suarez et al v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 3:2012cv00574
Plaintiff:
Christine Suarez and Carlos Suarez
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Suarez v. Burdett et al
as 5:2012cv00241
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Suarez
Defendant:
Helda Burdett, Barbara Epis, Linden Arms Properties and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
IN RE: PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT LITIGATION
as 3:2011md02295
Plaintiff:
Inna Badran, Morris Padulo, Chenelle McCall and others
Defendant:
PRA Group, Inc., Neal Stern, Cynthia Patterson and others
Not Classified By Court:
United States of America and Avaya Inc.
Petitioner:
Sharina Talbot Romano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Juan Carlos Suarez v. Anthony Hedgepeth
as 8:2010cv00546
Respondent:
Anthony Hedgepath
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Suarez
Wong et al v. Golden State Supply Inc et al
as 3:2008cv04569
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wong, Patrick Wong, Patrick Wong and others
Defendant:
Golden State Supply Inc, Golden State Supply Inc, General Parts Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
