Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ashok Babu, et al v. Gregory Ahern, et al
as 22-15355
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ASHOK BABU, ROBERT BELL, IBRAHIM KEEGAN-HORNSBY and others
Appellant:
TYLER ABBOTT, ANTHONY AARON, ROBERT ABEYTA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GREGORY J. AHERN, Sheriff; in his official capacity as Sheriff of the Alameda County Sheriffs Office, CAROL BURTON, in her official capacity as Interim Director of the Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services Agency, KARYN L. TRIBBLE, in her official capacity as Director of the Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services Agency and others
Defendant:
RAYANN KRUM, TREVOR SPINGOLA and ROBERT ABEYDA
Coleman et al v. Jeffries et al
as 4:2020cv04218
Plaintiff:
Carlton Coleman, Milton Jones and Donald Fountain
Defendant:
. Rankin, Robert Hamilton, Rob Jeffries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Godinez et al
as 3:2016cv03225
Plaintiff:
Carlton Coleman
Defendant:
T. Scott Keen and John R Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Godinez et al
as 3:2016cv00572
Plaintiff:
Carlton Coleman
Defendant:
T. Scott Keen and John R Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Godinez et al
as 3:2016cv00234
Plaintiff:
Carlton Coleman
Defendant:
T. Scott Keen and John R Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Godinez et al
as 1:2016cv01011
Plaintiff:
Carlton Coleman
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Randy Pfister, Eldon Kennell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAMPSON et al v. CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS et al
as 1:2013cv24312
Plaintiff:
EARL SAMPSON , TOREE M DANIELS , ANTHONY LOWERY and others
Defendant:
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS , OLIVER G GILBERT, III , SHIRLEY GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Godinez et al
as 1:2008cv05974
Plaintiff:
Carlton Coleman
Defendant:
S Godinez, Ramiro, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
