Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Phillips v. Carnahan et al
as 4:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III
Defendant:
Mel Carnahan, Jr. and State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carnahan v. Dollar General Corporation
as 4:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Lisa Carnahan
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Carnahan v. Vandergriff
as 4:2022cv01272
Petitioner:
Gerald Carnahan
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of Missouri et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2021cv01300
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri, State of Nebraska, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., United States of America, United States Office of Personnel Management and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Smith-El v. A Construction Company et al
as 4:2016cv01743
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Smith-El
Defendant:
A Construction Company, State of Missouri, City of St. Louis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Volker v. Morgan et al
as 6:2015cv03420
Plaintiff:
Todd A. Volker
Defendant:
Michael R. Morgan, Deborah M. Hamilton, Carl D. Jungers, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. State of Missouri et al
as 2:2015cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Smith
Defendant:
State of Missouri, City of St. Louis, MSI Workhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Carnahan Courthouse
as 4:2015cv00628
Petitioner:
Clyde Johnson
Respondent:
Carnahan Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
