Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Crater et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2012cv08190
Plaintiff:
Matthew John Crater and Brenda Lynn Crater
Defendant:
Arizona Attorney General's Office, Kent Cattini, Arthur Markham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Springer et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as LAW/6:12-cv-00838
Plaintiff:
William David Springer and Fannie Carol Springer
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals LLC and others
Springer et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2012cv00838
Plaintiff:
William David Springer and Fannie Carol Springer
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals L L C, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peter Palmer v. County of Yavapai, et al
as 10-17690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER MICHAEL PALMER
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF YAVAPAI, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, MARY E. HAMM, SHEILA POLK and others
Arizona Green Party et al v. Bennett et al
as 2:2010cv01902
Plaintiff:
Arizona Green Party and Claudia Ellquist
Defendant:
Ken Bennett , LeNora Johnson, Jim Claw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Yavapai, County of et al
as 3:2010cv08049
Plaintiff:
Peter Michael Palmer
Defendant:
Yavapai, County of, Mary E Hamm, Unknown Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Lowry, et al v. Yavapai County Board of Superv, et al
as 08-17408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY FRANCIS LOWRY, husband and MARIAN CAROL, wife
Defendant - Appellee:
YAVAPAI COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CAROL SPRINGER, Chairman District 1, THOMAS THURMAN, Vice-Chairman District 2 and others
Lowry, et al v. Yavapai County Board of Supervisors, et al
as 3:2008cv08025
Defendant:
Yavapai County Board of Supervisors, Carol Springer, Thomas Thurman and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Lowry and Marian Carol
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
