Cases 61 - 70 of 775
Carr v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv00445
Petitioner:
Raymond Earl Carr
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Forsythe v. Carr et al
as 4:2022cv00099
Petitioner:
Samantha Elizabeth Forsythe
Respondent:
Michael Carr, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Attorney General of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hebert v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
William Albert Hebert
Defendant:
Capt. Jones, Corp. Olaughlin, Sheriff Greg Capers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poff v. Carr
as 22-10096
Petitioner / Appellant:
Julia Ann Poff
Respondent / Appellee:
Michael Carr, Warden
Carr v. City Of Houston et al
as 4:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Carr
Defendant:
City Of Houston, Troy Finner, Kim Ogg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Carr
as 3:2022cv00058
Petitioner:
Alexis C Norman
Respondent:
Michael Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carr v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2021cv04454
Plaintiff:
Vanissa Lee Carr
Defendant:
U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Carr v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv03070
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Norma G. Carr
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, Johnson & Johnson Inc and others
Interested Party:
Plaintiffs Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gauch v. Carr
as 21-11165
Petitioner / Appellant:
Amber Dawn Gauch
Respondent / Appellee:
Michael Carr, Warden, FMC Carswell
Poff v. Carr
as 4:2021cv01288
Petitioner:
Julia Ann Poff
Respondent:
Warden Michael Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
