Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Branch-Williams v. Davis et al
as 1:2012cv00206
Plaintiff:
Joyce Branch-Williams
Defendant:
Robert Davis, Beth Carr, Jeffrey M. Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Carre v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv02791
Plaintiff:
Daniel Clarence Carre
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mang et al v. City of Greenbelt, Maryland et al
as 8:2011cv01891
Plaintiff:
Blanche Mang and Lynda Sheppard
Defendant:
City of Greenbelt, Maryland , Matthew Carr , Johnnie Guy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carr v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv01507
Plaintiff:
Ruth E Carr
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Usiak v. Officer Robert I. Brown, et al
as 1:2010cv02374
Plaintiff:
Norman C. Usiak
Defendant:
Robert I. Brown , Anthony Carr , Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Carr et al v The Whitestone Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03412
Plaintiff:
Brandi Carr, Brandi Carr, Brandi Carr and others
Defendant:
The Whitestone Group, Inc. and International Union of Security, Police and Fire Professionals of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Houzouris v. Karas et al
as 1:2009cv02502
Plaintiff:
Silvia Houzouris
Defendant:
John S. Karas, Nick Houzouris, William O. Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Docu Print Imaging, Inc. v. Whitten et al
as 1:2009cv01960
Plaintiff:
Docu Print Imaging, Inc.
Defendant:
Amy Lynne Whitten, Thomas W. Carr, Mary Louise Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
USA v. 31 Arbor Hill Road et al
as 1:2008cv01695
Plaintiff:
United States Of America and United States Of America
Defendant:
31 Arbor Hill Road, 25 Bancroft Avenue, 1007 Carrs Road and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
