Cases 21 - 30 of 266
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 14th Amendment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Randolph v. City of Harrisburg et al
as 1:2022cv01239
Plaintiff:
Samuel Randolph
Defendant:
City of Harrisburg, Robert Fegan, Donald Heffner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Carter v. Fauver et al
as 1:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
Tyreen Carter
Defendant:
Dakota Fauver, Christian Batten and Andrew Groh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DELTONDO v. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
DENISE DELTONDO
Defendant:
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PITTSBURGH, THE BOARD OF PUBLIC EDUCATION OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PITTSBURGH, ANTHONY HAMLET and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
