Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
CARTER v. GREENSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv01829
Plaintiff:
Craig Carter
Defendant:
Greensburg Police Department, City of Greensburg, Indiana, John Doe Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TORRES v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 3:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
DANIEL M. TORRES
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT, INDIANA STATE POLICE SUPERINTENDENT, DOUGLAS G. CARTER in his individual capacity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KELLY v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KELLY
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, KAY WILKS, M.D., CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARP II v. INDIANA STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2021cv02626
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL C ARP II
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE POLICE, DOUGLAS CARTER, Charles Sorrells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v, HARLOW et. al
as 1:2021cv01547
Defendant:
CURT ENGERT, DONNA HARLOW, DEBRA DOTSON and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v, HARLOW et al
as 1:2021cv01566
Defendant:
CURT ENGERT, DONNA HARLOW, DEBRA DOTSON and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FARMER v. HAMMOND POLICE et al
as 1:2021cv01636
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH S. FARMER
Defendant:
CHRISTISON, ANTHONY ADAMS, DANIAL MITTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RASHID BEY v. MOORE et al
as 1:2020cv03200
Defendant:
ALAN WEIMER, ALLAN WILSON, ROBERT BAKER and others
Plaintiff:
AR RAZZAAQ RASHID BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
