Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carter v. Fort Bend Independent School District et al
as 2:2017cv01930
Defendant:
Kendall Beckman, Andrew Brink, Jason Burdine and others
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02718
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Woods vs City of Reno, et al
as 3:2016cv00494
Plaintiff:
Woods, Cathy Woods and Anita Carter
Defendant:
City of Reno, Clarence A. "Jackie Lewis, Lawrence C. Dennison and others
Petitioner:
Oregon Department of Corrections and Recordkeeper Nickie Basinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tibbitts et al v. Douglas County
as 3:2016cv00296
Plaintiff:
Kyung Ae Bae, Jill Berliner, Don E. Blackard and others
Defendant:
Douglas, County Of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Orr v. City of Reno et al
as 3:2016cv00122
Defendant:
Brian Atkinson, Chris Caprioli, Andy Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon J. Orr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01092
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Simpson v. Agatone et al
as 2:2015cv00254
Defendant:
F. Agatone, Matt Carter, T. Hatchett and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
