Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Goodman v. Davenport et al
as 1:2015cv00470
Petitioner:
Timothy Millard Goodman
Respondent:
Carter F. Davenport and Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Windham v. Strange et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2015cv00145
Plaintiff:
James Roscoe Windham
Defendant:
Luther Strange and Carter F. Davenport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perkins v. Davenport et al
as 1:2014cv02186
Petitioner:
Timmy George Perkins
Respondent:
Carter F Davenport and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perkins v. Davenport et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2014cv01046
Plaintiff:
Timmy George Perkins
Defendant:
Carter F. Davenport and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Howlet v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv01077
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Howlet
Defendant:
Carter F. Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2014cv00694
Petitioner:
Jamal Roydrick Woods
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and Carter F Davenport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abrams v. Davenport et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2014cv00141
Plaintiff:
Jamie Alan Abrams
Defendant:
Carter F. Davenport and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Malloy v. Davenport, et al. (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00784
Plaintiff:
Arthur Brennan Malloy
Defendant:
Carter F. Davenport and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Soliz-Bresino v. Alabama Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv01437
Petitioner:
Jose Luiz Soliz-Bresino
Respondent:
Alabama Dept of Corrections, Carter F. Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
