Cases 1 - 10 of 11
USA v. a. one (1) Genuine Gucci Mens Chronoscope 101M G Design with Stainless Steel Bracelet, Black Dial with bezel set, Serial No. 11885892 et al
as 3:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
a. one (1) Genuine Gucci Mens Chronoscope 101M G Design with Stainless Steel Bracelet, Black Dial with bezel set, Serial No. 11885892, b. one (1) 10K Yellow Gold Square Foxtail Chain Long Necklace 25.0 inches Length with Lobster Closing Clasp, c. one (1) Mens Fake Rolex Watch, Submariner Style 18K All Stainless Steel Case and Bracelet Black, Inside Bezel or Lugs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. 1.One Genuine Mens Rolex Watch, Submariner Style, 41MM, Sapphire Crystal, Blue Ceramic Bezel Blue Dial, Serial No. 386U64F7 et al
as 3:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
1). ONE GENUINE MENS ROLEX WATCH, SUBMARINER STYLE, 41MM, SAPPHIRE CRYSTAL, BLUE CERAMIC BEZEL BLUE DIAL, SERIAL NO. 386U64F7;, [2] ONE GENUINE MENS ROLEX WATCH, SUBMARINER STYLE, 41MM, STAINLESS STEEL & 18K YELLOW GOLD, SERIAL NO. 42DM7808;, [3] ONE GENUINE MENS ROLEX WATCH, SUBMARINER STYLE, 41MM, SAPPHIRE CRYSTAL, BLACK DIAL W/CERAMIC BLACK BEZEL, SERIAL NO. 554825R6; and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Cevallos v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv01392
Plaintiff:
Luis Antonio Cevallos
Defendant:
United States of America, MDC Guaynabo Warden and Case Manager Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Genuine Rolex 18k Solid Rose Gold Watch, GMT Master II Design et al
as 3:2022cv01223
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
GENUINE ROLEX 18K SOLID ROSE GOLD WATCH, GMT MASTER II DESIGN WITH SOLID ROSE GOLD OYSTER BRACELET REF. 126715. GOLD CONDITION., GENUINE ROLEX MEN'S18K YACHTMASTER II ALL YELLOW GOLD WATCH, WHITE DIAL, CERAMIC BLUE BEZEL OYSTER BRACELET, WITH DOUBLE CLASP. MODEL NUMBER# 116688, SERIAL NUMBER H44V7303 INCLUDES ORIGINAL, GENUINE ROLEX 18K SOLID ROSE GOLD AND STAINLESSSTEEL WATCH, YACHTMASTER II DESIGN REF. 116681, SERIAL NUMBER# 5538L503, WHITE DIAL WITH BLUE COLORED CERAMIC BEZEL, INCLUDING WARRANTY CARD, ORIGIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
USA v. (A)$568,556.00 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2021cv01354
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
(A)$568,556.00 in United States Currency;, (B) 2014, Gray, Porsche Cayenne SUV bearing Puerto Rico license plate number ICM134 with vehicle identification number (VIN) WP1AA2A28ELA90824;, (C)Apple i-Phone cellular phone with yellow cover and no identification number visible; and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
Estrada v. Cases et al
as 3:2019cv02013
Defendant:
Gustavo Rivera, Jose Gonzalez, Aaron Green and others
Plaintiff:
Elvin Torres Estrada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Koch Foods Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01605
Defendant:
Mar-Jac Holdings, LLC, Simmons Prepared Foods, Inc., Harrison Poultry, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
USA v. $5,580.00 in U.S. Currency; $52.66 in Dominican Republic Currency; One (1) Currency Bill Counter; One (1) Plastic Arm Case; Once (1) Video Recorder; One (1) Samsung Galaxy Cellphone; One (1)
as 3:2015cv02576
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$5,580.00 in U.S. Currency; $52.66 in Dominican Republic Currency; One (1) Currency Bill Counter; One (1) Plastic Arm Case; Once (1) Video Recorder; One (1) Samsung Galaxy Cellphone; One (1)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Diaz-Martinez v. Policia De Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2014cv01559
Plaintiff:
Miguel L. Diaz-Martinez
Defendant:
Policia De Puerto Rico, Administracion Correccion, Departamento de Justicia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. Serial no. CS66C11001137 et al
as 3:2011cv01440
Defendant:
Gateway Desktop Comp Serial no. CS66C11001137, DVD Burner Tower Serial no. DOP80234572, DVD Burner Tower Serial no. 170606081 and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
