Cases 41 - 50 of 128
Goodwin v. Hawk-Sawyer et al
as 1:2020cv00606
Defendant:
Darrin Howard, DHO Bittenbender, Warden H Quay and others
Plaintiff:
Joal William Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell May v. Eric Bradley, et al
as 20-1729
Defendant:
COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, J. RICHARDSON, Trust Fund Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
MAY v. BRADLEY et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Defendant:
COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GORAL and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Moore v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2020cv00052
Defendant:
Case Manager Andrews, United States Of America and Unit Manager Gardea
Plaintiff:
Demetrious Adonis Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Gordon v. SIS Buebendorf, et al
as 19-3824
Defendant / Appellee:
EDINGER, C.D./M.D., RAJJOUB, Medical Doctor, GASS, Education Department and others
Defendant:
C.O. HURLEY, C.O. BARBELLA, C.O. GASS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE GORDON
Overton Pauley, et al v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 19-3666
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN BOYER, SOR, T. SMITH, BB Unit Case Counselor, CHASE FARREL, DA Unit Case Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STORMEY D. KISSELL, ZACHARY T. KING, WILLIAM RAY RHOADES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OVERTON WAYNE PAULEY, on behalf of Asatru/Odinist Faith Community
In re: Michael Gordon
as 19-3474
Not Yet Classified:
HICKS, Case Manager, EDINGER, C.D./M.D., MALACHY E. MANNION and others
In re: Michael Gordon
as 19-3489
Not Yet Classified:
HICKS, Case Manager, EDINGER, C.D./M.D., MALACHY E. MANNION and others
In re: Michael Gordon
as 19-3490
Not Yet Classified:
HICKS, Case Manager, EDINGER, C.D./M.D., MALACHY E. MANNION and others
Bush v. Griffin et al
as 1:2019cv01521
Defendant:
Case Manager Shade, Counselor Griffin, Officer Beaver and others
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Bush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
