Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Kepler et al v. NaphCare Incorporated et al
as 4:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Karina Kepler, Carlin Casey and Mary Hutchinson
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated, Pima, County of, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08380
Plaintiff:
Casey Cox
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08334
Plaintiff:
Casey S Martin
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mogler et al v. Peters et al
as 2:2023cv01107
Plaintiff:
Native American Ceremonial Drums Group, Stanley Dashee, Nicholas Lister and others
Defendant:
Collette Peters, RA Heisner and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Murphy-Richardson #333262, et al. v. Lewis et al
as 2:2022cv01639
Plaintiff:
Ismael A Murphy-Richardson and Casey Fletcher
Defendant:
Samuel A Lewis, Charles L Ryan, Joan Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Leopard v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2021cv08228
Plaintiff:
Casey Leopard
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Bullhead City, City of and Anita Dale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eden v. Home Depot USA et al
as 2:2021cv00333
Defendant:
Home Depot USA and Peter Buckles
Plaintiff:
Casey Daniel Eden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eden v. Chopra et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Plaintiff:
Casey Daniel Eden
Defendant:
T Chopra and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shook v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv04905
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Casey Leon Shook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fowler v. Maricopa County Estrella Jail
as 2:2019cv02426
Plaintiff:
Casey Azure Fowler
Defendant:
MCSO Estrella Jail and Maricopa County Estrella Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
