Cases 1 - 10 of 15
CARANZA v. PYLES et al
as 1:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
JOSE M. CARANZA
Defendant:
OFFICER PYLES, OFFICER SHAFFER, WARDEN DAVID CASSIDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. CASSIDY
as 1:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
ANDREW SCOTT MOORE
Respondent:
DAVID CASSIDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Cassidy
as 3:2023cv00665
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Moore
Respondent:
David Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Barnette v. Cassidy
as 5:2023hc02167
Petitioner:
John Thomas Barnette
Respondent:
David Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Erdody et al v. Airborne Systems North America of NJ, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Brycen Erdody and Cassidy Erdody
Defendant:
Airborne Systems North America of NJ, Inc., HDT Global, LLC, Aerostar International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ward v. Quate
as 5:2023ct03049
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Wendell Ward
Defendant:
Alicia Cassidy Quate and Eddie M. Buffaloe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griggs v. In Demand Services, LLC
as 5:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Cassidy Griggs
Defendant:
In Demand Services, LLC and In Demand Services, LLC d/b/a InDemand Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
ALI v. TERRELL et al
as 1:2021cv00544
Defendant:
DAVID CASSIDY, MONICA BOND, RICHARD TERRELL and others
Plaintiff:
ABDULKADIR SHARIF ALI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
