Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Cassidy v. Indivior Inc. et al
as 1:2024sf65029
Defendant:
Aquestive Therapeutics Inc., Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ewell Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Cassidy v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
Jane Cassidy
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meyer v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
CASSIDY MARIE MEYER
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lucas v. Cassidy et al
as 1:2022cv00774
Plaintiff:
Angel Marie Lucas
Defendant:
Correction Officer Cassidy, Scioto County Sheriff Office, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Collar Jobs, LLC et al v. Stocum et al
as 1:2022cv01892
Plaintiff:
Collar Jobs, LLC and Collar Diversified, LLC
Defendant:
Benjamin Stocum, Delta Diversified, Inc., Cheryl Pearson and others
Chung v. Upstart Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03620
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Chung
Defendant:
Upstart Holdings, Inc., Jeff Huber, Kerry Cooper and others
Menkaus et al v. City of Milford, Ohio et al
as 1:2022cv00568
Plaintiff:
Tara Menkaus, Linda Cassidy and Cassidy Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
City of Milford, Ohio and Christine Celsor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OConnor v. Huber et al
as 2:2022cv02961
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM OCONNOR
Defendant:
JEFF HUBER, KERRY COOPER, CASSIDY SINGH SUKHINDER and others
Cassidy v. Adams County et al
as 1:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Leo Cassidy
Defendant:
Adams County, Ohio, Adams County Board of Commissioners, Adams County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
