Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Cassie Colby v. Daniel Sokup, et al
as 20-2799
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW STRASZOWSKI, JAMES KAWALOCHEX and DANIEL J. SOKUP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASSIE SUE ZARUBA GALI COLBY
Hayes v. Leslie et al
as 1:2020cv01326
Defendant:
. Gish, . Henry, . Coon and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childers, Amy et al v. Menard, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00107
Defendant:
Does 1 - 10 and Menard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nazar Mansoor, Steve Schussler, Ryan Ingalls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley v. Wexford Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00733
Defendant:
Jerry Whithoft, Jane Doe, Bob Jeffreys and others
Plaintiff:
Deandre Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zaruba Galindo Colby v. Lake Hallie Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv00883
Plaintiff:
Cassie Sue Zaruba Galindo Colby and Cassie Sue Galindo Zaruba Colby
Defendant:
Lake Hallie Police Department and Chippewa County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Dollard, et al v. Gary Whisenand, et al
as 19-1602
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA, AARON DIETZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Acting by and through its Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASSY L. BRATCHER, ERIC W. LEY, YVONNE S. MORGAN and others
Barrows v. Goldman et al
as 3:2019cv00252
Defendant:
Mrs. Walton, Ms. Mall, C/O Quant and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Barrows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03823
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03255
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pollard v. BMO Home Health Care Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00377
Plaintiff:
VERONICA POLLARD
Defendant:
CASSIE MCKINLEY and BMO HOME HEALTH CARE INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
