Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05502
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
GRAJALES BUENO v. MULLIN et al
as 5:2026cv05312
Plaintiff:
JUAN DIEGO GRAJALES BUENO
Defendant:
SECRETARY MARKWAYNE MULLIN, ACTING ATTY GEN. TODD BLANCHE, DIRECTOR JOSEPH B. EDLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04936
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04809
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Catalano v. Elite Nurses Management LLC
as 1:2026cv01052
Plaintiff:
Maria Catalano
Defendant:
Elite Nurses Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Catalano v. Good Vibes Trading Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv02048
Plaintiff:
Garret Catalano
Defendant:
Good Vibes Trading Company, Inc. Doing business as Modern Gents
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Catalano v. City Beauty, LLC
as 2:2026cv02047
Plaintiff:
Garret Catalano
Defendant:
City Beauty, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
