Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BROWN v. CATALENT, INC. ET AL.
as 3:2023cv15722
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BROWN
Defendant:
CATALENT, INC. ET AL., JOHN CHIMINSKI, ALESSANDRO MASELLI and others
Husty v. Catalent, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Cameron Husty
Defendant:
J. Martin Carroll, Madhavan Balachandran, Michael J. Barber and others
Nominal Defendant:
Catalent, Inc.
REGENXBIO Inc. et al v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00667
Plaintiff:
REGENXBIO Inc. and The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania
Defendant:
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., Sarepta Therapeutics Three, LLC and Catalent Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CITY OF WARWICK RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. CATALENT, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv01108
Plaintiff:
CITY OF WARWICK RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant:
CATALENT, INC., JOHN CHIMINSKI, ALESSANDRO MASELLI and others
CATALENT, INC. v. CAO
as 2:2021cv16512
Plaintiff:
CATALENT, INC.
Defendant:
YAJUAN CAO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
UCB, Inc. et al v. Catalent Pharma Solutions Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00038
Plaintiff:
Research Corporation Technologies, Inc., UCB, Inc., UCB Biopharma SPRL and others
Defendant:
Catalent Inc., Catalent Pharma Solutions Inc. and Catalent Pharma Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
CATALENT INC. v. DANBY
as 3:2020cv12368
Defendant:
SYBIL DANBY
Plaintiff:
Catalent Inc. and CATALENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
DANBY et al v. Catalent Inc.
as 3:2020cv12367
Plaintiff:
SYBIL DANBY
Defendant:
Catalent Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
DANBY et al v. CATALENT, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04278
Plaintiff:
THE DISCOVERY LABS, INC. and SYBIL DANBY
Defendant:
CATALENT PHARMA SOLUTIONS, INC. and CATALENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company v. Catalent, Inc.
as 1:2016cv04414
Plaintiff:
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Catalent, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
