Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Santana-Cerano v. Rule et al
as 4:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Maribel Santana-Cerano
Defendant:
Warden FNU Rule, Warden FNU Cates, FNU Nodiand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Warden Smith et al
as 4:2023cv01097
Plaintiff:
Carlese Hall
Defendant:
Warden Smith, APRN Smith, HSA Chano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Julien v. Kaplan City Police et al
as 6:2023cv00594
Plaintiff:
Reginald James Julien
Defendant:
Police Dept of Kaplan, Terry Krout, Patrick Doucet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Shannon Pitts
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Officer FNU Derry and FNU Cates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Bureau of Prison et al
as 4:2022cv01127
Plaintiff:
Shannon Pitts
Defendant:
Officer FNU Derry, FNU Cates and Bureau of Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Ezell et al
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Johnny Haynes
Defendant:
Mike Ezell, Tyrone Nelson, Summit Foods Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cates v. Rose et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Kevin Roach, FNU Holt, FNU Flounory and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Dan Cates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnhill v. Muirhead et al
as 7:2019cv00026
Defendant:
C.O. Chacon, C.O. Cates, Warden E. Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
Cody Everett Barnhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Southwestern Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00357
Defendant:
Nurse Doe 1, Southwestern Corrections, Capt. FNU Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Eugene Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. United States et al
as 4:2018cv00871
Defendant:
FNU Cates, Doctor FNU Meija, Doctor FNU Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Helen Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
