Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Autoloxer LLC v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 2:2015cv01628
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc.
Plaintiff:
Autoloxer LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Trevino v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 5:2015cv00554
Plaintiff:
Rafaela Trevino
Defendant:
Caterpillar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Hayden et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2015cv02275
Defendant:
National Automotive Parts Association, Avondale Industries, Inc., Chevron Oronite Company LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline S. Hayden and Thomas H. Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gardner et al v. Paccar Inc et al
as 3:2015cv01643
Plaintiff:
Connie Gardner and Kenneth Gardner
Defendant:
Paccar Inc and Caterpillar Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harbor Docking and Towing Co L L C et al v. Rolls-Royce Marine North America Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02487
Defendant:
Rolls-Royce Marine North America Inc, Caterpillar Inc, Castleman Maritime L L C and others
Plaintiff:
Harbor Docking & Towing Co L L C and Point Comfort Towing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
GSI Equipment Group, LLC v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 3:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
GSI Equipment Group, LLC
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mitchell, d/b/a Universal Machine Repair v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 4:2014cv00983
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark R Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tri-City Charter of Bossier Inc v. Caterpillar Inc
as 5:2013cv03292
Plaintiff:
Tri-City Charter of Bossier Inc
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NovelPoint Tracking LLC v. Caterpillar Inc
as 6:2013cv00866
Plaintiff:
NovelPoint Tracking LLC
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jemasco, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 4:2013cv00588
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jemasco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
