Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00022
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Salley et al v. Webster County, Mississippi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00066
Plaintiff: Robert Salley and Bonita Cunningham
Defendant: Webster County, Mississippi , Tim Mitchell , Dillon Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cates v. SLM Corporation
as 4:2017cv00122
Plaintiff: Ulysses Cates
Defendant: SLM Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cates v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00068
Plaintiff: Teresa H. Cates
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
v. Clemens et al
as 3:2013cv00243
Respondent: Matthew Cates, CCA, CalCDC and others
Petitioner: Steven Anthony Clemens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alejandro Machuca v. Matthew Cate et al
as 3:2013cv00017
Plaintiff: Alejandro Machuca
Defendant: Matthew Cate, J W Moss, R Floweree and others
Crawford v. Epps et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00038
Plaintiff: Charles Ray Crawford
Defendant: Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Dixon et al
as 4:2012cv00018
Plaintiff: Julius M. Howard
Defendant: Lynn Dixon, Mildred Rome, Eddie Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Anderson et al
as 4:2011cv00125
Plaintiff: Charles E. Moore, Jr.
Defendant: Earless Anderson, Allen Silk, Jesse McCray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hays v. Leflore County, et al
as 4:2010cv00166
Plaintiff: Howard Hays
Defendant: Leflore County, , Richard Chip Roberts , Len Wooden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?