Cases 11 - 20 of 205
Harris #456411 v. Cota et al
as 2:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris #456411
Defendant:
Crystal Cota, Cullen Loman, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bearden #483938 v. Bauman
as 2:2023cv00069
Petitioner:
Eugene Bearden #483938
Respondent:
Catherine Bauman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griswold #576624 v. Bauman
as 2:2022cv00239
Petitioner:
DeShawn Griswold #576624
Respondent:
Catherine Bauman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller #188122 v. Bauman et al
as 2:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Jerome Lamar Miller #188122 and James Dudley
Defendant:
Catherine Bauman, Unknown Knox, Unknown Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardiner v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00166
Plaintiff:
Keith Edward Gardiner #383334
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Dennis Smith, Unknown Bedient and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shavers #378021 v. Bowerman et al
as 2:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
Michael Shavers #378021
Defendant:
Unknown Bowerman, Unknown Lancour, Unknown Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown #150582 v. Munising Memorial Hospital et al
as 2:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Brown #150582
Defendant:
Unknown Ray, Niksa Vlasic, Catherine Bauman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler #424595 v. Bauman
as 2:2021cv00079
Respondent:
Catherine Bauman
Petitioner:
Leroy Butler #424595
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCullough #937466 v. Bauman et al
as 2:2021cv00042
Defendant:
H. Washington, Catherine Bauman and A. Hubble
Plaintiff:
Darius McCullough #937466
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford #560561 v. Detroit, City of, et al
as 2:2020cv00256
Defendant:
G. Jack, Darryl Cross, George Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Seanderyl Crawford #560561
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
