Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Michael Garrison v. Rementa Wilson, et al
as 24-1198
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GARRISON
Defendant:
REMENTA WILSON, LAVERNE CHAPMAN, JAQUELINE RUFF and others
Hardrick v. Olsen et al
as 2:2024cv10484
Plaintiff:
Bernard Hardrick
Defendant:
A. Olsen, Cathy M Garrett, Shantel Word and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardrick v. Olsen et al
as 5:2024cv00853
Plaintiff:
Bernard A. Hardrick
Defendant:
A. Olsen, Cathy M. Garrett, Shantel Word and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCreary-El v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2023cv12100
Plaintiff:
Carnell M McCreary-El
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Cathy M. Garrett, Lisa Denise Peterson and others
Watley v. Reale et al
as 2:2023cv10978
Plaintiff:
William Rayeh Watley
Defendant:
Tammy J. Reale, Gretchen Whitmer, Jacquelyn A. Mcclinton and others
Claimant:
William-ray Watley, William Daniel Watley, Darius Rayel Watley and others
Watley v. Whitmer et al
as 2:2023cv10831
Plaintiff:
William Rayeh Watley and William-Rayeh Watley [E-filer]
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Jacquelyn A. Mcclinton, Eric Ramadan Sabree and others
Price et al v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv12776
Plaintiff:
Minnie Bell Price and Ronald James Cooks
Defendant:
Kenyetta Stanford Johnson, Eric Decker Thomas, Dawn White and others
Watley et al v. Kenny et al
as 2:2022cv11392
Plaintiff:
William Rayeh Watley, William-ray Watley, William Daniel Watley and others
Defendant:
Timothy M. Kenny, Jacquelyn A. Mcclinton, Justin L. Smith and others
Monica Conyers v. Cathy Garrett, et al
as 22-1494
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONICA A. CONYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
CATHY M. GARRETT and DANA NESSEL, Michigan Attorney General
Conyers v. Garrett
as 2:2022cv11152
Plaintiff:
Monica Conyers
Defendant:
Cathy M. Garrett and Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
