Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Cato v. Biden et al
as 5:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Avery Cato
Defendant:
President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris and FBI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. T.D.C.J Corr. Officers et al
as 6:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
T.D.C.J Corr. Officers, Jeffery Catoe, Mathew Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Pruitt et al
as 6:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Myron J. Pruitt, Daniel Choate, Homero Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AML IP, LLC v. The Cato Corporation
as 2:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
AML IP, LLC
Defendant:
The Cato Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cato v. District of Columbia
as 1:2023cv01523
Plaintiff:
Avery Cato
Defendant:
District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Giller v. Linde Inc et al
as 3:2023cv02626
Plaintiff:
Christopher Giller
Defendant:
Linde Inc, Linde Engineering North America LLC, Lisa Dawn Cato and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Cato et al v. City of Houston et al
as 4:2023cv03735
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Cato and Christopher Alan Cato
Defendant:
CITY OF HOUSTON, HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Allstate Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Cato v. Pedro et al
as 6:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Henry Cato, Jr.
Defendant:
O. Pedro, Cori Brown and Kelli J. McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ben v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv04033
Plaintiff:
Cato Ben and Ben Cato
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
AML IP, LLC v. The Cato Corporation
as 6:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
AML IP, LLC
Defendant:
The Cato Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
