Cases
DiGaudio v. Begley et al
as 1:2019cv01926
Defendant: Robert A. Hagemann, David C. Dvorak, Paul M. Bisaro and others
Plaintiff: Alex DiGaudio
Nominal Defendant: Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Karp v. Begley et al
as 1:2019cv01855
Defendant: Robert A. Hagemann, David C. Dvorak, Paul M. Bisaro and others
Plaintiff: Howard Karp and Alex DiGaudio
Nominal Defendant: Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shah et al v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00815
Plaintiff: Shah, Local 1500 UFCW, Rajesh M Shah and others
Defendant: Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Betsy J Bernard and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00745
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Civil Rights None
IN RE: ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC., SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE AND EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT (ERISA) LITIGATION
as 1:2009ml06000
Plaintiff: PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION 719 PENSION FUND, PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION 719 PENSION FUND, PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION 719 PENSION FUND and others
Defendant: ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00535
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
HAYS v. DVORAK et al
as 1:2008cv01108
Plaintiff: JAMES HAYS, JAMES HAYS and JAMES HAYS
Defendant: DAVID C. DVORAK, STUART M. ESSIG, LARRY C. GLASSCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?