Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Cedric Jones, Sr. v. Brian Eller
as 23-5174
Petitioner / Appellant: CEDRIC JONES, SR.
Respondent / Appellee: BRIAN ELLER, Warden
Cedric Jones, Sr. v. Chance Leeds
as 22-5706
Petitioner / Appellant: CEDRIC JONES, SR.
Respondent / Appellee: CHANCE LEEDS, Warden
Cedric Jones, Sr. v. Grady Perry
as 22-5143
Petitioner / Appellant: CEDRIC JONES, SR.
Respondent / Appellee: GRADY PERRY, Warden
JONES V. THOMAS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2021cv00095
Plaintiff: CEDRIC JONES
Defendant: THOMAS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Sheriff CARLTON POWELL, Lt VIRGINIA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benn v. Jenkins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01635
Defendant: Gary, Lt. Jenkins, Jeffery Best and others
Plaintiff: Michael Labron Benn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Jenkins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01486
Defendant: Department of Corrections and Mohammad Jenkins
Plaintiff: Cedric Jones, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Blackburn et al
as 3:2018cv00237
Plaintiff: Cedric Jones
Defendant: Cheryl A. Blackburn and Board of Judicial Conduct
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cedric Jones v. Berrien County Jail, et al
as 17-1884
Plaintiff - Appellant: CEDRIC JONES
Defendant - Appellee: BERRIEN COUNTY JAIL, L. PAUL BAILEY, Sheriff, Unknown Party #1, UNKNOWN PARTY #2, named as John or Jane Doe, as Under Sheriff of Berrien County Jail and others
Jones v. Lindamood et al
as 3:2017cv00943
Plaintiff: Cedric Jones
Defendant: Elaine Heard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cedric Jones, Sr. v. Jason Manqru, et al
as 17-5327
Plaintiff - Appellant: CEDRIC JONES, SR.
Defendant - Appellee: JASON MANQRU, MACKIE, WOLF, ZIENTZ & MANN, P.C., Individual Capacity, WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?