Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Smith v. City of Lorain et al.
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Nancy Smith
Defendant:
City of Lorain, Joel Miller, Russ Cambarare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Brown v. Buddy Sivert, et al
as 22-3091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT BUDDY SIVERT, CITY OF LORAIN, OH, POLICE OFFICER STEYVEN G. CURRY and others
Brown v. Sivert, et al
as 1:2021cv01630
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown
Defendant:
SGT. Buddy Sivert, City of Lorain, Police Officer Steyven G. Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitmore v. Lorain Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv00525
Plaintiff:
Carl W. Whitmore
Defendant:
Lorain Police Department, Cel Rivera, City of Lorain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Filing Error
as 1:2016cv02973
Defendant:
City of Lorain , Cel Rivera and Christopher Ferenzi
Plaintiff:
Jared Brillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brillon v. City of Lorain et al
as 1:2016cv02975
Defendant:
City of Lorain , Cel Rivera and Christopher Ferenzi
Plaintiff:
Jared Brillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. City of Lorain et al
as 1:2016cv02248
Defendant:
City of Lorain , Cel Rivera , Zachary Ferenec and others
Plaintiff:
Pele Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marrero v. Vecchiarelli et al
as 1:2016cv01693
Plaintiff:
Tito E Marrero
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Vecchiarelli, Solomon Oliver, Jr., F.B.I. Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Lorain City Police Dept. et al
as 1:2012cv02754
Plaintiff:
Sherri L Saunders
Defendant:
City of Lorain Police Dept., City Of Lorain, Michael Gidich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montelon v. City Of Lorain et al
as 1:2010cv01918
Plaintiff:
Joseph Montelon
Defendant:
City Of Lorain, Cel Rivera, Richard Resendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
