Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Emrit v. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
as 8:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Bahrampour v. National Security Agency et al
as 1:2021cv02412
Plaintiff:
Afshin Bahrampour
Defendant:
National Security Agency, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Majid v. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
as 8:2020cv02886
Plaintiff:
Tanveer S. Majid
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donoghue v. Newcombe et al
as 1:2020cv02736
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Mark Lilly, President Jimmy Carter Library and others
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Donoghue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Majid v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 8:2020cv00233
Plaintiff:
Tanveer S. Majid
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Grant v. Haspel et al
as 1:2019cv02265
Defendant:
Gregory K. Harris, Gina Haspel and Central Intelligence Agency
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Grant v. Harris et al
as 8:2019cv02284
Defendant:
Gregory K. Harris, Special Collection Service and Central Intelligence Agency
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rossmann v. Sapin et al
as 8:2017cv02223
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann
Defendant:
Linda Sapin, Central Intelligence Agency, John Doe - 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garner v. Department of Energy et al
as 1:2015cv03485
Plaintiff:
Alexander Carl Garner, III
Defendant:
Department of Energy, FBI, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gardner v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 1:2015cv00728
Plaintiff:
Lael Gardner
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
