Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Pech v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 1:2023cv01350
Plaintiff:
Samuel Biar Pech
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 5:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Franklin Smith
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Elite Combatant Special Units, Oklahoma City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reinas v. United States Dept Defense
as 23-50211
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Moses Reinas
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Defense, and affiliates, Austin State Hospital, Texas Department of Public Safety and others
Taylor v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 2:2023cv01548
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hathon Taylor, IV
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Andrew Semple, Jennifer Kolbe and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Reinas v. Austin State Hospital, The et al
as 1:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Moses Reinas
Defendant:
United States, Dept of Defense, Austin State Hospital, The, Texas Dept of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. USA
as 22-50698
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dylan Charles Evans
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, FBI, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Logan v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 3:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Charise L Logan
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Homeland Security, Department of Secret Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan v. CIA
as 22-10195
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charise L. Logan
Defendant / Appellee:
Central Intelligence Agency, Homeland Security, Department of Secret Service and others
Grant v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 2:2019cv13747
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
Special Collection Service and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
