Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Joseph Robertson, et al v. Chevron USA, Incorporated, et al
as 15-30920
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSEPH ROBERTSON, LARRY HANKTON, SHARVONNE JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, MOBIL EXPLORATION AND PRODUCING US, INCORPORATED, JOSEPH F. GREFER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHEVRON USA, INCORPORATED, individually and as the successor corporation of Gulf Oil Exploration & Production, Company, BP EXPLORATION & OIL, INCORPORATED, and/or BP Products North America, Inc. and/or Amoco Oil Company, CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY and others
Joseph Robertson, et al v. Chevron USA, Incorporated, et al
as 15-90107
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JOSEPH ROBERTSON, LARRY HANKTON, SHARVONNE JOHNSON and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, MOBIL EXPLORATION AND PRODUCING US, INCORPORATED, JOSEPH F. GREFER and others
Defendant - Respondent:
CHEVRON USA, INCORPORATED, individually and as the successor corporation of Gulf Oil Exploration & Production, Company, BP EXPLORATION & OIL, INCORPORATED, and/or BP Products North America, Inc. and/or Amoco Oil Company, CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY and others
Robertson, et al. v. Chevron USA, Inc., et al
as 2:2015cv00874
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robertson , Larry Hankton , Sharvonne Johnson and others
Defendant:
Chevron USA Inc , BP Exploration & Oil Inc., ConocoPhillips Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Warren Lester, et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al
as 15-90002
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
WARREN LESTER, ALFREDA MARSHALL, DAVID QUINN and others
Defendant - Respondent:
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, CHEVRON USA, INCORPORATED, JOSEPH GREFER and others
Warren Lester, et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al
as 14-31383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN LESTER, ALFREDA MARSHALL, DAVID QUINN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, CHEVRON USA, INCORPORATED, JOSEPH GREFER and others
Warren Lester, et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al
as 14-90039
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
WARREN LESTER, ALFREDA MARSHALL, DAVID QUINN and others
Defendant - Respondent:
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY and others
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Arch Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2014cv07510
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London and Certain London Market Insurance Companies subscribing to Policy No. 507/N11NA08244 (Companies), Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London and Certain London Market Insurance Companies subscribing to Policy No. 507/N11NA08242, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London and Certain London Market Insurance Companies subscribing to Policy No. 507/N11NA08241 and others
Defendant:
Torus Specialty Insurance Company, Commonwealth Insurance Company, Steadfast Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc
Northrop Grumman Guidance and Electronics Company, Inc. v. Employers Insurance Company of Wausau et al
as 4:2013cv01154
Plaintiff:
Northrop Grumman Guidance and Electronics Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Employers Insurance Company of Wausau , OneBeacon America Insurance Company , Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Soo Line Railroad Company v. Certain Underwriter at Lloyd's London et al
as 0:2013cv03083
Plaintiff:
Soo Line Railroad Company
Defendant:
Certain Underwriter at Lloyd's London, Certain London Market Insurance Companies, Employers Surplus Line Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Lexington Insurance Company et al v. Office Depot, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv09990
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc. , Hilton Trading Corporation and Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Lexington Insurance Company , Arch Specialty Insurance Company , Hanover Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
