Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 492
The Pointe On Westshore LLC v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's Of London Subscribing to Policy Number AMR-65342 et al
as 8:2022cv02475
Plaintiff: The Pointe On Westshore LLC
Defendant: Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's Of London Subscribing to Policy Number AMR-65342, Indian Harbor Ins. Co., Lexington Ins. Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Type: Contract Insurance
Sanchez v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy Number BVH00001040
as 1:2022cv23509
Plaintiff: Jorge L. Sanchez
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy Number BVH00001040
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Gillispie et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London et al
as 4:2022cv00689
Plaintiff: Anna Gillispie and Raintree Medical and Chiropractic Center, LLC
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London and Allied Professionals Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0205 Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award
Type: Contract Insurance
Zurich American Insurance Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
as 22-2697
Plaintiff / Appellee: Zurich American Insurance Company and American Zurich Insurance Company
Defendant: Arch Insurance Company
Defendant / Appellant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Policy Number B12630308616
Kerlerec Condominium Association, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
as 2:2022cv03847
Plaintiff: Kerlerec Condominium Association, Inc.
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London, subscribing to Policy No. JTA251026 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
City Land Properties et al v. StarStone Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv03797
Plaintiff: City Land Properties, J and J Partners, LLC and Diversified Enterprise of New Orleans, LLC
Defendant: StarStone Specialty Insurance Company and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd' s, London v. Allied Professionals Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv01852
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd' s, London
Defendant: Allied Professionals Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
124 N Genois, LLC et al v. StarStone Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv03782
Plaintiff: 124 N Genois, LLC, Diversified Enterprise of New Orleans, LLC, 124 N Genois LLC and others
Defendant: StarStone Specialty Insurance Company and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Aras v. Secured Risk Insurance Group Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv05617
Plaintiff: Nev Aras
Defendant: Secured Risk Ins. Group, Inc., Secured Risk Insurance Group Inc and Certain Underwriters of Lloyds of London
Special Master: Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. 600230 v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv08579
Petitioner: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London Subscribing to Policy No. 600230
Respondent: Expeditors International of Washington Inc., Expeditors International Ocean and Doe
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?